Piedmont Missouri Wave

Theoretical Alignment

Rutledge himself never claimed an extraterrestrial origin outright, but his language — describing an "intelligence equal to or greater than that of man" that the team "interacted with" — sits closest to a cautious ETH framing, hence the moderate alignment score. The Psycho-Social Hypothesis also earns real weight here: the initiating several-hundred-report flap of February–April 1973 shows the classic contours of a regional social-contagion event (heavy local press coverage, word-of-mouth, hundreds of untrained lay reports), even though Rutledge's own core instrumented team worked specifically to separate that noisy public layer from its own smaller, vetted observational record. The Interdimensional Hypothesis finds almost no support: nothing in the Project's records describes portal-like phenomena, matter transformation, or other IDH-specific observables.

Background

Piedmont, Missouri is a small city in the Ozark foothills of northwestern Wayne County in southeastern Missouri, with a population of under 2,000 in the 1970s and today. It sits roughly 75 miles southwest of Cape Girardeau and about 140 miles south of St. Louis, in wooded, sparsely populated terrain drained by the St. Francis and Black Rivers. The nearby Clearwater Lake reservoir, whose dam Rutledge notes was completed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 1948, is the area's largest body of water; many of the 1973 lights were reported between Brushy Creek and the lake, and some nights more than 300 cars were parked at the dam with people watching the sky. The region had a modest earlier history of reports: a short-lived UFO flap in southeast Missouri was covered by the Cape Girardeau Southeast Missourian on January 16, 18, 19 and 21, 1967.

The physicist who would go on to lead the case's investigation, Harley D. Rutledge, was born January 10, 1926 in Omaha, Nebraska, son of Earl and Irene Hoagland Rutledge. He served in the U.S. Army from 1944 to 1946, earned an A.B. from Tarkio College in 1950, an M.S. from the University of Missouri–Columbia in 1956, and a Ph.D. in solid-state physics from the same institution in 1966. After teaching at Central College in Fayette, Missouri (1957–1960), he joined the physics faculty at Southeast Missouri State (then a college) in Cape Girardeau in 1963, chaired the department from 1964 to 1982, and taught until he retired in 1992 (Southeast Missourian obituary, 2006). His doctoral work was on photoelectric emission from strontium oxide, and he had just finished two years as vice-president and president of the Missouri Academy of Science. He married Ruth Lootens in 1954, and the couple raised five children, including a son, Mark, who would later join his father in the field. By his own account his curiosity about UFOs dated from the early 1950s, when he read two of Major Donald Keyhoe's books, Flying Saucers from Outer Space and The Flying Saucers Are Real; he later read the University of Colorado's 1968 Condon Report, which he faulted for sending investigators to sightings after the fact instead of setting up observation stations in the field. He called himself "somewhat of a closet iconoclast."

Rutledge did not jump at the case. When two colleagues jokingly suggested in March 1973 that he investigate Piedmont, he replied, "I wouldn't touch that with a ten-foot pole!" He wrote that he spent more than a week weighing the risk to his career before deciding to go. On March 27 he sent a memorandum to the university president, Dr. Mark Scully, saying that he, Dr. Sidney Hodges, Prof. Milton Ueleke and two students, John Wilson and King Turnbull, planned to take telescopes, cameras, a magnetometer, sound recorders and binoculars to Piedmont. Two commuting students, Ron Miller of Piedmont and Joe King of Mill Spring, had also come to his office with a story of their own. In the book he says the 1967 flap had drawn "only a mild interest" from him: he turned down a friend's invitation to go UFO watching because "a scientist wouldn't jeopardize his career in that manner."

Complete Timeline

Date	Event
Jan. 1967	A short-lived UFO flap in southeast Missouri is covered by the Cape Girardeau Southeast Missourian. Rutledge later wrote that it drew "only a mild interest" from him.
Feb. 21, 1973	Clearwater High School basketball coach Reggie Bone and five players, driving home from a tournament at Dexter, see a configuration of red, green, amber and white lights near Route 60 and again, hovering silently, near Brushy Creek — the sighting that first drew national attention to Piedmont.
Feb.–Apr. 1973	Several hundred calls are made to local police, sheriffs and newspapers (Missouri Secretary of State); the 2023 sponsor of the "UFO Capital" bill put it at "over 500 reports of sightings within one month."
Weekend of Mar. 31, 1973	Astronomer J. Allen Hynek visits Piedmont at the invitation of State Representative Jerry T. Howard. He calls what he found "very uninteresting stuff" and blames the "power of suggestion," but adds that "neither of us can punch any holes in the story of the basketball coach."
April 6, 1973	Harley Rutledge, Milton Ueleke and their wives make their first visit to Piedmont. Rutledge later dated the Project's first year from this night.
April 12, 1973	Flying over Piedmont in a Cessna 150 piloted by physics student Drake Kambitch, Rutledge sees an amber light go out as an identical light comes on miles away; Kambitch says a light "shot straight up," which he estimates climbed a mile in about one second.
April 13, 1973	Multi-station Brushy Creek-area observations log four separate lights with calculated altitudes near 4,666 feet and transit speeds of 130–340 mph.
May 11, 1973	From a Cessna 182 near Piedmont, Rutledge alone sees ten lights appear one after another in his binocular field over about 45 seconds; the others aboard see nothing unusual. He later called this flight the one that changed his research plans.
June 4–5, 1973	The summer phase begins at a Nash Road station near the Cape Girardeau airport with the Southeast Missouri Astronomy Club; on June 4 a light is followed by two jets that Rutledge could not trace to any base.
June 19, 1973	Rutledge personally observes a "bullet-shaped" gray object in daylight near his home; he says it turned olive green as he framed it with his hand and was gone when he looked up with binoculars two seconds later.
Oct. 3, 1973	Truck driver Eddie Webb of Greenville reports that a flash from an object following his rig on I-55 near Jackson, a few miles west of Cape Girardeau, temporarily blinded him and melted his glasses. After a road-flare test, Rutledge issues a statement that a hoax is possible.
1975–1979	Field setups become rare (none in 1976–77); most sightings are "accidental," several by Rutledge, his wife Ruth and son Mark from around the family home.
Nov. 9, 1979	The last sightings reported in Rutledge's book: a flash of xenon-like light seen at dusk from Westridge Drive near his home.
1980	The period covered by the Project's statistics (1973–1980) ends.
1981	Rutledge publishes Project Identification: The First Scientific Field Study of UFO Phenomena (Prentice-Hall).
1986	Rutledge presents "Project Identification: Thirteen Years and One-Hundred and Sixty Sightings Later" at the MUFON symposium.
June 5, 2006	Harley Rutledge dies at age 80 at the Missouri Veterans Home in Cape Girardeau.
Aug. 28, 2023	Missouri Senate Bill 139 takes effect, formally designating Piedmont and Wayne County the "UFO Capital(s) of Missouri" for the wave's 50th anniversary.
May 23, 2024	Piedmont — UFO Capital of Missouri Park opens with a ribbon cutting; its signage describes Rutledge's investigation.

The February–April 1973 Flap

The wave that would eventually draw a physics department chairman into seven years of fieldwork began, as most such waves do, with ordinary people. On the night of Wednesday, February 21, 1973, Clearwater High School basketball coach Reggie Bone was driving five of his players home from a tournament at Dexter. On Route 60 they noticed a rotation of red, green, amber and white lights in a tree line and, as Bone recalled, "more or less passed it off as an airplane." After they turned off and came over Brushy Creek, one of the boys saw "that thing we saw over on Highway 60" again. Bone stopped the car: "It's hard to judge at night, but I would say the object was less than two hundred yards away... Here was this object that appeared to be some fifty feet up off the ground with the same light rotation" (as quoted by Rutledge). They could not make out a shape; the row of lights looked like portholes, and after about ten minutes the configuration rose silently at an angle and disappeared over a ridge. Bone was in his eighth season as coach and, Rutledge wrote, "probably the best-known and most popular person in the area"; no one in Piedmont, he added, doubted his word.

Bone's sighting did not occur in isolation. From the next night onward, reports came from Brushy Creek and elsewhere: lights that stalled cars or knocked out radios and television pictures, lights over the KPWB radio transmitter, objects said to sit in fields. Missouri's Secretary of State describes "several hundred calls" to local police, sheriffs and newspapers between February and April 1973; Representative Chris Dinkins, sponsoring the 2023 "UFO Capital" bill, said law enforcement "had over 500 reports of sightings within one month." The flap drew national coverage and, on the weekend of March 31, a visit from Northwestern University astronomer J. Allen Hynek, the Air Force's former Project Blue Book consultant, invited by State Representative Jerry T. Howard at the request of Police Chief Gene Bearden. Hynek said the brief visit turned up only "very uninteresting stuff" and "a great number of highly excited people," blamed the "power of suggestion" for lights that were probably distant beacons on observation towers, and warned "You have to disregard any light on the horizon." But he added that not all the evidence was negative: "neither of us can punch any holes in the story of the basketball coach" (as quoted by Rutledge).

It was against this backdrop — a real, large, geographically concentrated wave of civilian reports, a mixed verdict from the field's best-known scientist, and mounting national media curiosity about a small Ozark town suddenly making international headlines — that Rutledge decided the question deserved a more systematic answer than either uncritical acceptance or a one-visit dismissal could provide.

The Founding of Project Identification

Rutledge's stated motivation was as much about the town's treatment as about the phenomena themselves. "I didn't like the way the Piedmonters were being treated by the media, and I was disturbed that some of the people there were truly frightened," he told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch in 1977; in the book he notes that some reporters portrayed residents as uncultured or suggested the sightings were a scheme to bring in tourists. His involvement began on Friday, April 6, 1973, six weeks after Bone's sighting, when he, Ueleke and their wives drove to Piedmont and met radio manager Dennis Hovis. He named the effort "Project Identification" after the second of its two stated objectives: "to measure the physical properties of the lights and/or objects in the sky" and "to identify their origin." He also set an admission rule: a "lay report," a UFO report from someone without "college training or equivalent experience in one of the physical sciences," would not be accepted as scientific data, because he intended to present the results at a scientific meeting. This is the methodological decision that most separates Piedmont from a typical UFO flap, though in practice the Project's own observers were a mix of faculty, students and amateur astronomers.

An early team formed quickly. Astronomy instructor Milton Ueleke insisted that the single lights Rutledge saw from Pyle's Mountain on April 6 were automobile headlamps; Rutledge calculated that a pair of headlamps would be resolved as two lights by the naked eye out to about half a mile, and through his 80-power Questar out to about 40 miles, and he judged his light to be ten to fifteen miles away. Ueleke was not convinced. Physics students Drake Kambitch (a pilot, who flew Rutledge in a Cessna 150), John Wilson and King Turnbull volunteered; Dr. James Sage of the Industrial and Technical Education Department brought electronics expertise; nuclear physicist Dr. Robert Freeman watched from Piedmont's airport with Turnbull on April 14 but, like Dr. Sidney Hodges, soon withdrew from the field work. Rutledge wrote that at least thirty-five scientists, engineers, students and lay persons helped at one time or another, and his acknowledgments thank "the nearly 40 Project members." His often-quoted totals of "620 observers on watch, 378 of them Project observers" are not head-counts: he defined an "observer" so that one person present on three nights counted three times.

Funding was a persistent constraint; Rutledge wrote that the Project was "short of funds." The St. Louis Globe-Democrat's managing editor, George A. Killenberg, "saw the possibility of a good story and awarded the first Project grant" (reported in the Kansas City Times in December 1973 as $2,000). The university's Research Council made three grants, the dean of the College of Science, Dr. Donald Froemsdorf, accepted the study as "a bona fide research topic," and several individuals gave money or equipment. The Southeast Missouri Astronomy Club, led by Robert L. Adams, became a mainstay of the field work.

Equipment & Methodology

The equipment list Rutledge assembled for Project Identification was, by the standards of civilian UFO research in the 1970s, genuinely unusual in its breadth. The team's core optical instruments were Questar telescopes — compact, high-quality astronomical telescopes whose magnification could be adjusted without swapping eyepieces, useful for quickly tracking a moving light — supplemented by an 8-inch Celestron C-8 telescope for higher-power work. For non-visual data, the team fielded a magnetometer to detect variations in the local magnetic field, an electromagnetic (RF) spectrum analyzer, a Tektronix oscilloscope, and a high-frequency, low-intensity sound detector paired with audio recorders, on the theory that a genuinely anomalous object might leave an electromagnetic or acoustic signature even when its visual behavior was ambiguous. Photographic documentation used 35mm cameras (Praktica and Yashica Matic-9 bodies among them) loaded with both black-and-white and color stock, occasional long-exposure and time-lapse setups to capture a light's path across the sky, a spectroscopic camera, and cameras loaded with infrared-sensitive film. Field communications ran on three 37.1 MHz transceivers, and a portable 1.6-kilowatt gasoline generator kept remote stations powered through the night. For aerial work, rented Cessnas let Rutledge take binoculars and cameras aloft, most memorably on the April 12 and May 11, 1973 flights described below. For "Operation Intercept," a planned three-team stake-out at Piedmont in late May 1973, the team also ordered an S-band radar set from a firm in Greenville, Mississippi, but the rental was cancelled; as Rutledge put it, "our radar set never arrived."

Methodologically, Rutledge's team tried to do something most UFO investigations of the era did not: calculate, rather than merely describe. By recording a light's angular altitude and azimuth from one or more known station positions, timing its transit between two points, and (where multiple stations observed simultaneously) triangulating its position, the team derived working estimates of altitude, distance, apparent size, and speed for individual sightings — the same basic surveying principle an astronomer uses to fix a star's position, applied here to a moving light of unknown origin. This is a real methodological advance over eyewitness description alone, but it carries an important limitation this case file treats as central rather than incidental: the underlying inputs (an observer's read of angular altitude through a telescope, the exact instant a light appeared to move) still depend on human judgment and timing under field conditions, so the resulting speed and acceleration figures are calculated estimates from Rutledge's own team, not radar-confirmed or independently replicated measurements.

Rutledge also coined labels of his own. The "random flashbulb effect" (RFEX, the X for xenon) described a burst of xenon-like flashes scattered over a patch of sky, first seen at Farmington in May 1973, after which a steady light sometimes appeared and moved off. "Pseudostars" were stationary lights that blended into the star field, sometimes as an extra "star" in a familiar constellation, until they moved or went out — a category that implicitly assumed some sightings began as ordinary-looking points of light and only became interesting at the point of apparent change. Physical objects, as opposed to point-source lights, were recorded more rarely: Rutledge listed seven craft shapes seen by Project members, among them triangular light formations, a fluorescent disc, a daylight disc and, on one occasion that disturbed him personally, a solid-looking "bullet-shaped" object.

Phase 1: The Founding Season (April–May 1973)

The Project's earliest sustained fieldwork produced its most detailed single data table. On the night of April 13, 1973, in the Brushy Creek area, Rutledge's team logged four separate lights, with angular elevations and transit times for some of them (Table I in the book). "Light A," observed at 7:18 p.m., transited north to south at roughly 10 degrees of angular altitude, yielding a calculated altitude near 4,666 feet and a transit speed of approximately 340 mph. "Light C," observed later the same evening at 9:20 p.m., transited south to north at the same 10-degree angular altitude and the same calculated 4,666-foot altitude, but at a markedly slower 130 mph — two lights, on the same night, at the same calculated altitude, moving in opposite directions at very different speeds. A final sighting that night, at 10:45 p.m., described an orange streak of light that appeared to merge into a slower-moving white light. The altitudes and speeds depend on the distances Rutledge assumed for each light (for Light A, a seventeen-mile path crossed in three minutes). Taken together, the April 13 data illustrates both the strength and the limitation of his approach: timestamped, calculated figures exist, but they rest on estimated distances for four brief nighttime observations rather than on a tracking record of one object.

The night before, on Thursday, April 12, 1973, Rutledge had flown to Piedmont in a Cessna 150 piloted by Drake Kambitch to look for a mountaintop road for a headlamp experiment. Southeast of town after dark, an amber light on the slope of Clark Mountain went out just as an identical light came on about seven ridges away. As the plane approached the second light, Kambitch shouted that it had shot straight up. Rutledge, watching through binoculars with a seven-degree field, could not follow the climb; Kambitch, watching with the naked eye, estimated that the light rose a mile in about one second. Rutledge filed both the on-off switch and the apparent reactions to the plane under "coincidence," explaining that "we cannot know if the UFO truly reacted to us or if it was just a coincidence" — an honest caveat, and one of the more scientifically careful lines in the book.

From Kambitch's estimate Rutledge worked out what such a climb would mean. Assuming constant acceleration over one mile in one second, the light would have accelerated at 10,560 feet per second squared, about 330 times the acceleration of gravity and "sufficient to crush most living creatures," and would have been moving at 7,200 miles per hour at the end of the mile. He noted that such a speed should have produced a sonic boom and heated a solid object to incandescence, yet the light simply faded as it rose. The figure is therefore arithmetic built on one observer's naked-eye guess of distance and time, not a measurement, and there was no radar or photographic record. A month later, on Friday, May 11, 1973, flying near Piedmont in a Cessna 182 with pilot Jim Trickey, John Wilson and Kambitch, Rutledge alone saw ten lights appear one after another in his binocular field over about 45 seconds; the others saw nothing unusual that evening. He later told a newspaper that this was his first UFO sighting, and wrote that the trip "was to change my research plans completely."

Phase 2: Nash Road and the June 1973 Sessions

By June 1973, the Project had matured into a more systematic, multi-station operation. On June 4, the team established a primary observation post on Nash Road, a flat flood-plain site roughly two miles west of the Cape Girardeau airport chosen specifically for its unobstructed 360-degree horizon, with other stations later set up at sites such as Blomeyer, Dutchtown and farms around Cape Girardeau. The choice of a site near the regional airport was deliberate: it let observers directly compare unidentified lights against the running lights of known aircraft using the same field of view, a control most amateur UFO-watching setups never bother to build in. Members of the Southeast Missouri Astronomy Club joined the effort from the first night, adding a further layer of astronomically literate eyes capable of distinguishing planets and bright stars from genuine unknowns.

On the night of June 4, the team watched a light cross their position and appear to stop, after which two jets came over. Rutledge also obtained a signed statement from Paul Hughes, who said he and two others had seen a yellow-white light pass silently over Jackson at about 10:50 p.m., followed by two jets on the same course at lower altitude. Rutledge wondered whether Missouri Air National Guard F-100s from Lambert Field had been involved, but "none of the administrative personnel at several state and federal air bases" he asked knew of any operations in the Cape Girardeau area that night. Whether this was a real military response, unrelated traffic, or misidentification could not be resolved in this research; no Air Force record tying a sortie to this date was located.

Two weeks later, on June 19, 1973, Rutledge had his most personally unsettling encounter of the entire Project, one he recorded from his own driveway rather than a formal field station. He observed what he described as a "bullet-shaped" object, dull gray in color, moving eastward. When he raised his hand in an attempt to frame or gesture toward it, Rutledge reported that the object's color instantly changed to a dull olive-green; it had vanished by the time he snatched his binoculars from the car, which he says took no more than two seconds. Rutledge subsequently wrote of sensing a genuine "interaction" between the observed phenomenon and the observers watching it — language that, read charitably, reflects a scientist trying to describe an apparent behavioral correlation he could not otherwise explain, and read skeptically, illustrates exactly the kind of single-observer, no-instrumentation anecdote that even Rutledge's own admission standards were designed to filter out of the Project's harder data. A similar disappearance recurred on July 10, 1973, when a light passing overhead went out as Rutledge swung his long lens toward it; three minutes later, he reported, a jet followed the same path, and through binoculars its wings looked "serrated, like a saw blade," with light spread unevenly over its underside — a detail this case file reads as suggestive of aircraft misidentification rather than confirmation of it, given the absence of any independent identification of the aircraft in question.

The Eddie Webb Incident (October 3, 1973)

The Project's only piece of physical-trace evidence arrived from outside its own observation network. At about dawn on Wednesday, October 3, 1973, truck driver Eddie Webb (Eddie Doyle Webb, 45, of Greenville, Missouri, in UPI's report; Rutledge's book calls him only "the truck driver") was on I-55 just past the Jackson exit, a few miles west of Rutledge's Cape Girardeau home, when he saw red and yellow lights following about a mile behind his rig. He woke his wife, Velma Mae, in the sleeper cab, but she could not see them. He later described a turnip-shaped object about 30 feet across. When he leaned out of the cab to look back, a "flash, like a ball of fire" hit him in the face; his wife said he screamed "I can't see! I can't see!" His glasses had fallen off, with one lens out of the melted, twisted frames. She drove on to their destination, the Sam Tanksley trucking complex near the Cape Girardeau airport, and he was taken to Southeast Missouri Hospital, where, according to Rutledge, a local ophthalmologist found no evidence of blindness, burns or other injury to his eyes. Sgt. Ed Wright of the Missouri Highway Patrol passed the glasses to Rutledge the next day.

Rutledge first told UPI that under the microscope "it appeared they were heated internally." His further checks found no radioactivity; Dr. Donald Froemsdorf, a chemist, ruled out acid or ordinary flames and suggested vapors from a volatile chemical; an American Optical laboratory in Cape Girardeau could not reproduce the damage on similar frames and found the glass lenses undamaged. A night foreman at Tanksley then told Rutledge that another driver had seen Webb's truck that morning at a rest stop fifteen miles north of Cape Girardeau with a road flare near it, and a driver at the rest stop said "Road flare!" as soon as he saw the frames. Rutledge bought flares and found that holding one within six inches of similar frames for several seconds produced a similar damage pattern, though "no one could withstand such heat while wearing the frames." He dropped a planned reactor test and released a statement that a hoax was possible, while adding that he "had not proved that the incident did not happen." Press accounts also quoted a St. Louis ophthalmologist, Dr. C. E. Windsor, who doubted a flare could explain Webb's temporary blindness and suggested "psychic shock." Webb claimed workmen's compensation; a referee, Edward F. Raglin, ruled in 1975 that he had been injured on the job, then set the ruling aside, and the parties settled out of court.

Phase 3: The Long Tail and the Rutledge Family (1974–1979)

Rutledge sensed the flap would last about a year, and his records bear him out: 96 sightings on field nights in 1973, 23 in 1974, and only a handful afterwards. Fieldwork continued at a reduced pace, largely at Nash Road and other stations near Cape Girardeau and, increasingly, from Rutledge's own yard. His statistical review found that sightings were more common around sundown. For the first year, Thursday nights had the highest success ratio (29 sightings on 13 nights) and Friday the next (28 on 21), while Wednesday had 9 on 11. Rutledge noted that the Thursday figure was inflated by ten sightings on two nights at Farmington, and that the peak disagreed with other studies he cited (Poher and Vallée, the Vallées, and John Keel) which put the peak on Tuesday or Wednesday.

From 1975 the Project entered what Rutledge called its period of "accidental sightings": he made few field setups (none at all in 1976 and 1977, when his teaching and administrative load nearly doubled) but kept checking the sky. On January 3, 1975, driving home with his wife Ruth, he saw a self-luminous, fluorescent-colored disc pass over the next block; she described a flying disc too, though she did not see the small yellow light he saw on its dome. On August 21, 1976, visiting his parents in Council Bluffs, Iowa, he watched a stationary light near Omaha go out. On the morning of Sunday, September 5, 1976, he saw a disc from his second-floor office window in Magill Hall shoot upward and fade out. Son Mark had sightings of his own from the front yard in 1978, and on June 28, 1979 Ruth reported a bright hovering light over the house that seemed to react to her gaze (not counted in the statistics, because she was not a Project member). The last sightings in the book came on November 9, 1979: a flash of xenon-like light seen at dusk from Westridge Drive.

Classification, Statistics, and Rutledge's Own Conclusions

Rutledge built his own three-tier classification system to sort the Project's accumulated observations: "Identified" sightings, where the team itself determined a conventional source (most often an aircraft, but also astronomical objects, atmospheric phenomena, or ground lights); "Unidentified Class B," ambiguous lights or objects that were too distant, too briefly observed, or too obscured by weather or terrain for the team to confidently rule in or out a mundane explanation; and "Unidentified Class A," reserved for sightings the team judged to display genuinely unusual characteristics — unexplained behavior, extreme speed or acceleration, anomalous coloration, or a shape inconsistent with any known aircraft or natural phenomenon. In his final report Rutledge "carefully selected 40 Class B sightings of 42 UFOs, all seen during darkness, as possible aircraft or helicopters" that the team could not identify but felt it should have been able to, and he subtracted them in several of his statistical tables. That is a real act of self-correction, though it also means the remaining figures still include sightings he rated Class B.

The Project's own totals are set out in the book's final report. In 1973 alone it logged 105 sightings of 122 UFOs, 23 of them Class A. For the whole seven-year period, 1973 to 1980, it set up 158 viewing stations, watched for 427 hours (an average of 2.7 hours per station), and recorded 157 sightings of 178 UFOs, of which 34 sightings (45 UFOs) were Class A; 33 of the 157 were "accidental" sightings made away from a field setup. Later figures are Rutledge's personal counts: more than 140 by 1977 (St. Louis Post-Dispatch), the "One-Hundred and Sixty Sightings" in the title of his 1986 MUFON paper, and 163 by 1988 (Daily Nonpareil).

What Rutledge himself ultimately concluded is best captured in his own words from the 1981 book, a passage repeatedly cited by later researchers as the clearest statement of his final position: "Unbiased, disinterested physical scientists usually measure the properties of inanimate matter. Biological, medical, and behavioral scientists, on the other hand, study intelligences less than or equal to their own. In this Project, we dealt with an intelligence equal to or greater than that of man. We interacted with the phenomenon under study." This is a genuinely unusual thing for a tenured physics department chairman to have committed to print in 1981, and it deserves to be read as exactly what it is: not a claim of alien contact, and not a claim of any specific origin, but a considered judgment from a credentialed scientist that a meaningful fraction of what his team recorded behaved as though it were responding, purposefully, to being watched. At the same time, Rutledge was consistently careful to avoid the "UFO believer" label and stressed repeatedly that most individual sightings had conventional explanations; his own son Mark later confirmed this restraint was deliberate, recalling that his father held that "scientists are not going to draw conclusions on things data won't support." Rutledge, in other words, appears to have believed both that the great majority of the Piedmont-area reports were mundane and that a genuine, unexplained residue remained — a more nuanced position than either a wholesale UFO endorsement or a wholesale debunking, and one this case file treats as central to a fair reading of his work.

Reception, Skepticism, and Legacy

Project Identification's reception among Rutledge's ufological contemporaries was mixed, and one well-known criticism ran the opposite way from how it is usually retold. Jacques Vallée, in The Invisible College (1975, p. 16), objected to the hoax verdict Rutledge had issued on the Webb eyeglasses: "Like the Pascagoula story of robot-like monsters, the facts were unbelievable to local scientists, who examined them out of context of the overall phenomenon" (as quoted by Rutledge, who answered, "What facts?"). In other words, Vallée was faulting Rutledge for being too dismissive of one report, not dismissing Rutledge's project as credulous. Later online retellings paraphrase this as Vallée calling Rutledge "a confused local scientist"; those words are not Vallée's. Rutledge drew heavily on the skeptic Philip J. Klass's UFOs Explained in his own analysis, but no specific published critique of the Project by Klass was located for this case file.

Elsewhere, Rutledge's work found limited recognition. Historian David M. Jacobs, in The UFO Controversy in America (1975), called it "one of the most ambitious of scientific research projects on UFOs" (as quoted by Rutledge). A 2025 survey of the field by physicist Kevin H. Knuth and co-authors lists Rutledge among "Prominent Past Efforts and Individuals," describing Project Identification as the first scientific-instrumented attempt to study such lights and as "somewhat successful." Not every modern reader is persuaded. Writing for the Vatican Observatory's Sacred Space Astronomy blog in October 2025, Christopher Graney found the book promising at first (a major publisher, a credentialed author, a manuscript read by Kansas State physicist James E. Thomas and with advice from Stanford's Peter Sturrock), but concluded that it "was not particularly persuasive in its data, photographs ... and analysis," pointing to the book's later chapters on telepathy and on a "UFO intelligence" that mimics human technology. Rutledge himself stepped back from public ufology: in a July 1997 letter he wrote that he had "discontinued my UFO presentations several years ago" and was turning down a paid talk at the 34th National UFO Convention because his wife wanted to visit their grandsons.

The case's public legacy in Piedmont itself has outlived Rutledge. Senate Bill 139, passed by the Missouri General Assembly in 2023 and in effect from August 28, designates Piedmont and Wayne County the "UFO Capitals of Missouri" for the wave's 50th anniversary; its sponsor, Representative Chris Dinkins, said the purpose was tourism, not any judgment about the sightings. A commemorative festival, "Close Encounters of the Piedmont Kind," ran April 21–22, 2023, hosted by the Piedmont Area Chamber of Commerce with Missouri MUFON, and a "Piedmont – UFO Capital of Missouri Park" at 202 Legion Park Road opened with a ribbon cutting on May 23, 2024. Its signage says that Rutledge "investigated with his own team" and "issued a public paper in 1973." Missouri MUFON's state director, Debbie Ziegelmeyer, and assistant state director Margie Kay wrote 50th Anniversary of the SE Missouri Ozarks UFO Flap (Un-X Media, 2023). The Anomaly Archives in Austin, Texas keeps a file on Rutledge and the Project, including a list of press coverage from 1973 to 2006 and his 1997 letter.

Key Witnesses

The Five Observables Assessment

The Five Observables framework is applied to the performance characteristics reported across Project Identification's own logged sightings:

Assessment: The most extreme figure in this case comes from the April 12, 1973 Cessna 150 flight: physics student Drake Kambitch's naked-eye estimate that a light climbed a mile in about one second, from which Rutledge calculated about 7,200 mph and 330 g. Instant Acceleration and Hypersonic Velocity are rated "Present" only with the explicit caveat that this is arithmetic on one observer's estimate of distance and time, not a radar track or a measurement, and Rutledge himself noted the absence of the sonic boom and heating such speed should produce. No sighting in the Project's seven-year record describes trans-medium behavior, despite the proximity of Clearwater Lake to much of the reported activity. Low Observability is rated speculative because the Project never had radar of its own (its rented set never arrived); on May 30, 1973, Kansas City Center radar painted the Project's Cessna but not a light Rutledge and Kambitch were watching, and Rutledge noted that FAA radar coverage below 7,000 feet along the Cape Girardeau–Piedmont line was nil.

Evidence Assessment

Why "Disputed"

Project Identification earns a DISPUTED classification because it combines real, unusual-for-the-field methodological rigor with equally real, unresolved evidentiary gaps that neither confirm nor fully dismiss Rutledge's own conclusions. On the credibility side of the ledger: this is not a single uncorroborated witness account, but a nearly seven-year, multi-station, instrumented field study organized and led by a tenured physics department chairman, staffed in its founding core by colleagues and students with genuine physical-science training, and producing real, dated, calculated data rather than impressionistic description alone. Rutledge's own epistemic caution — his explicit acknowledgment that the team "cannot know if the UFO truly reacted to us or if it was just a coincidence," and his son's account that he deliberately withheld conclusions "data won't support" — reflects exactly the kind of self-skepticism a credible scientific investigator should show, and it is a meaningfully different posture than an advocate simply cataloging every anomaly as proof of something extraordinary.

On the other side of the ledger, the gaps are just as real. Every one of the Project's most dramatic calculated figures — the 7,200 mph, 330-g climb chief among them, which is arithmetic on one student's naked-eye estimate — rests entirely on the team's own field judgments, with no radar confirmation, no independent replication, and no publication in a peer-reviewed physics venue in the more than four decades since. The case's only tangible physical evidence, Eddie Webb's melted eyeglasses, was matched by Rutledge's own road-flare test, and Rutledge himself publicly called a hoax possible; the hospital ophthalmologist found no eye injury. And the Project's most striking interactive/reactive observations — the ones that most directly support Rutledge's ultimate "intelligence equal to or greater than man" conclusion — are disproportionately single-observer anecdotes rather than the multi-station, instrumented data the Project was specifically designed to produce. A case this well-instrumented for its era, led by this credentialed a source, but still missing independent replication, radar confirmation, and peer-reviewed publication, is exactly the profile of a Disputed rating: too methodologically serious to dismiss as simple misperception, too evidentially incomplete to rate as confirmed.

Sensor & Instrumentation Detection Profile

Project Identification's instrumentation was unusually broad for civilian 1970s ufology — Questar and Celestron C-8 telescopes for optical tracking, a magnetometer, a spectrum analyzer and Tektronix oscilloscope for electromagnetic signals, sound equipment, 35mm still photography (including time exposures and infrared-sensitive film), and rented Cessnas for aerial observation — but it never had radar of its own. An S-band set was ordered from a firm in Greenville, Mississippi for "Operation Intercept" in May 1973, but the rental was cancelled when no generator was available and, as Rutledge wrote, "our radar set never arrived." He noted that FAA radar coverage was poor in southeast Missouri, with no FAA coverage below 7,000 feet along the line from Cape Girardeau to Piedmont, though military radar at Blytheville AFB covered Piedmont above 2,000 feet. On May 30, 1973, Kansas City Center radar painted the Project's Cessna but not a light Rutledge and Kambitch were watching from it. No FAA, military, or civil radar log tying any Piedmont-area sighting to a corroborating return was located during this research.

Environmental & Geospatial Context

The Piedmont wave unfolded across rural, heavily wooded Ozark-foothills terrain in Wayne County, well outside any major metropolitan light-pollution footprint — conditions that produced unusually dark, clear rural night skies favorable to both genuine anomaly detection and to the specific "pseudo-star" misidentification of ordinary astronomical objects that Rutledge's own taxonomy explicitly anticipated. The nearby Clearwater Lake reservoir sat at the geographic center of much of the reported activity, though, notably, no sighting in the Project's record describes any water-related or trans-medium behavior despite that proximity. Wooded, hilly terrain limited any single ground observer's horizon, which is precisely why Rutledge's team relied on multiple stations (Pyle's Mountain, Clark Mountain, Brushy Creek, Nash Road and others) rather than a single fixed post. The regional airport near Cape Girardeau gave the Nash Road station a built-in comparison baseline against known aircraft lighting, while the area's few interstate and federal highways — including I-55 near Jackson, where Eddie Webb's October 1973 incident occurred — represented the region's only significant concentrations of nighttime vehicle and roadway lighting that could plausibly be misread from a distance.

Observer Credibility & Occupational Profile

Project Identification's founding core was an unusually credentialed observer pool for a UFO case: a physics department chairman with a University of Missouri Ph.D. in solid-state physics (Harley Rutledge), an electronics specialist (Dr. James Sage), an astronomy instructor (Milton Ueleke, notably one of the team's own internal skeptics), and several physics students (Drake Kambitch, John Wilson, King Turnbull); a nuclear physicist, Dr. Robert Freeman, joined one early session before withdrawing. That credibility thins once the Project's full scale is accounted for: about 40 members took part over seven years, admitted and trained by Rutledge rather than by any outside body, and many of the most striking observations were made by Rutledge alone or by him and one student. Rutledge's figures of 620 "observers on watch," 378 of them Project observers, count person-nights, not people. The wave's two best-known lay witnesses — Coach Reggie Bone and truck driver Eddie Webb — were not trained observers, and their accounts were never instrumented at the moment of the sighting.

Physical & Material Assays

The only physical object connected to this case is Eddie Webb's damaged eyeglasses from the October 3, 1973 incident — a dislodged lens and melted, twisted plastic frames, passed to Rutledge by Sgt. Ed Wright of the Missouri Highway Patrol. Rutledge examined them under a microscope, checked them for radioactivity (negative) and had them checked for residue; Dr. Donald Froemsdorf ruled out acid or ordinary flames, and an American Optical laboratory found the glass lenses undamaged. No metallurgical or spectrographic assay of the kind performed on trace samples in other cases on this site was made, and Rutledge dropped a planned nuclear-reactor test. The glasses' present whereabouts could not be established. Rutledge's own road-flare test produced a similar damage pattern on comparable frames.

Historical Precedents & Archive Matches

Piedmont sits within a documented, if modest, regional pattern of southeastern Missouri aerial anomaly reports: a smaller UFO flap had already occurred around Cape Girardeau, roughly 75 miles away, in 1967, six years before the Piedmont wave began, though Rutledge says it drew "only a mild interest" from him at the time. Separately, Wikimedia Commons hosts a declassified U.S. Air Force Project Blue Book case file dated October 1957 and indexed to "Piedmont, Missouri" — an entirely different, unrelated incident predating Rutledge's study by sixteen years, included here for completeness and explicitly not to be confused with the 1973 wave this case file documents. Project Identification's own instrumented, real-time methodology would not find a genuine successor for nearly a decade: the Hessdalen Lights project in Norway, beginning its own continuous field study in 1984, is the clearest later parallel, although Hessdalen's now four-decade-plus continuous instrumentation has long since surpassed Piedmont's seven-year run in scope.

Material Analysis

Physical trace evidence in this case is limited to a single artifact: the melted eyeglass frames and dislodged lens reported by Eddie Webb after his October 3, 1973 encounter on I-55 near Jackson, Missouri. This is a far thinner physical record than Project Identification's instrumented ambitions might suggest — the great bulk of the Project's own effort went into optical, electromagnetic, and acoustic detection of lights and objects in the sky, not into ground-trace or material sampling, since the phenomena the team tracked were almost never reported as landing or leaving physical residue.

What Happened to the Glasses

Webb's glasses were damaged during his reported encounter — one lens fell out, and the plastic frames were melted and twisted. The Missouri Highway Patrol (Sgt. Ed Wright) passed them to Rutledge the next day for examination. No record establishing where the glasses are held today, or whether they still exist, was located during this research.

The Flare Test and Its Limits

Rutledge himself made the flare test. After a Tanksley foreman told him that another driver had seen a road flare beside Webb's truck at a rest stop fifteen miles north of Cape Girardeau that morning, he bought flares and held one within six inches of similar frames; it took several seconds to bubble the plastic, and the damage pattern was similar to Webb's. He then released a statement that a hoax was possible. The test shows that ordinary heat can produce the damage, but it is a test of appearance, not of Webb's glasses specifically. On the medical side, the ophthalmologist who examined Webb in Cape Girardeau found no evidence of blindness, burns or eye injury (per Rutledge), while a St. Louis ophthalmologist quoted in the press, Dr. C. E. Windsor, doubted a flare could explain the reported blindness and suggested "psychic shock" — an untested opinion rather than a diagnosis.

The Conventional Explanation Candidate

Because Project Identification's own team spent seven years actively trying to sort conventional from anomalous sightings within its own data, this case file's Conventional Explanation Candidate analysis draws heavily on the team's own honest self-classification rather than reconstructing one from scratch. Rutledge set aside 40 of the Project's "Class B" sightings as possible aircraft or helicopters, and Hynek attributed much of the public flap to suggestion and distant tower lights — but a residual, smaller set of "Class A" observations, plus a handful of the Project's own most dramatic calculated figures, remain unexplained in the team's own account.

Aircraft Misidentification

Rutledge himself treated aircraft as the leading explanation for many of his ambiguous sightings, selecting 40 Class B sightings (42 UFOs) as possible jets or helicopters the team could not identify; he noted that National Guard helicopter units trained on set nights and that most of these 42 were seen near the J-35 jet airway. The June 4, 1973 Nash Road session ended with two jets following a light, and the July 10, 1973 incident involved a jet with odd-looking wings following the path of a light that had just gone out — both consistent with genuine aircraft being misread, at distance and at night, as something more exotic.

Astronomical Misidentification ("Pseudo-Stars")

Rutledge's own taxonomy explicitly built in a category — "pseudo-stars" — for stationary lights indistinguishable from ordinary stars or planets until they appeared to brighten, change color, or move. This candidate plausibly explains a meaningful fraction of the Project's more static, ambiguous sightings, particularly under the unusually dark, clear rural skies of the Ozark foothills. It does not, on its own, account for the sightings involving reported extreme motion, acceleration, or apparent reactive behavior, which by definition go beyond what a genuinely stationary astronomical object could produce.

Ball Lightning or Earth-Light Geophysical Phenomena

Paul Devereux's "Earth Lights" framework and Dr. Michael Persinger's related Tectonic Strain Theory — both developed independently of Piedmont and applied more directly to cases like the later Hessdalen Lights — propose that certain classes of nocturnal light phenomena arise from natural geophysical processes (piezoelectric charge generation along fault lines, ball-lightning-like plasma events) rather than any manufactured or biological source. The Ozark foothills' own underlying geology has documented fault structures, but this case file located no dedicated seismic, geological, or piezoelectric survey specifically tying Piedmont's own terrain to this mechanism, unlike the decades of targeted geophysical study behind the Hessdalen comparison. This candidate remains a genuine, geophysically plausible possibility for at least some of the Project's static or slow-moving light sightings, but it is speculative rather than demonstrated for this specific case.

Highway-Flare Reproduction of the Webb Incident

Specific to the Eddie Webb eyeglasses incident, Rutledge himself reproduced a similar damage pattern with an ordinary road flare after learning that a flare had been seen near Webb's truck at a rest stop that morning, and he publicly called a hoax possible. The examining ophthalmologist found no injury to Webb's eyes; a St. Louis ophthalmologist quoted in the press suggested "psychic shock" for the reported blindness. This candidate is well supported for the damage to the glasses, but no one established how a flare could have been held to Webb's face.

Related Cases

Further Reading — Recommended Literature

DISCLOSURE: Some links above are affiliate links. If you purchase through them, OverClassified receives a small commission at no additional cost to you. This helps support independent research.

Essential Viewing

Sources

• "Harley Rutledge," Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org
• "Biography:Harley Rutledge," HandWiki. handwiki.org
• "Area UFO expert Dr. Harley Rutledge, 80, dies." Southeast Missourian. semissourian.com
• "Obituary: Dr. Harley Rutledge." Southeast Missourian, June 7, 2006. semissourian.com
• "MO UFOs... and Miracles." Vatican Observatory, Sacred Space Astronomy. vaticanobservatory.org
• "Project Identification," Anomaly Archives. anomalyarchives.org
• "Rutledge, Harley," Anomaly Archives. anomalyarchives.org
• Rutledge, Harley D. Project Identification: The First Scientific Field Study of UFO Phenomena. Prentice-Hall, 1981 — full text. archive.org
• "Project Identification: the first scientific field study of UFO phenomena," Internet Archive (scanned volume). archive.org
• "Project Identification and Harley D Rutledge Part 1: Challenges, Opportunities, Synchronicities." ProfessorWHAM. professorwham.com
• "Project Identification Part 3: Phases 2 & 3, Ongoing Uncanny, A Family Affair, Vallee Gets It Wrong." ProfessorWHAM. professorwham.com
• "The First Scientific UFO Field Study." Podcast UFO. podcastufo.com
• "Dr. Harley Rutledge – A UFO Blueprint to Follow." In The Field. inthefield2017.weebly.com
• "Piedmont, Missouri celebrates UFO history with new park." FOX 2 (KTVI). fox2now.com
• "Did you know that Piedmont is the UFO capital of Missouri?" FOX 2 (KTVI). fox2now.com
• "Greetings, Earthlings: Piedmont opens UFO Capital of Missouri Park." Missourinet. missourinet.com
• "Piedmont, Mo. celebrates 50 years since reported UFO event." KFVS12. kfvs12.com
• "Ribbon cutting celebrates opening of UFO Capital of Missouri Park." KFVS12. kfvs12.com
• "Bill would name Piedmont as Missouri's UFO capital." Jefferson City News-Tribune. newstribune.com
• "UFO Melted His Glasses; Blinded Him, Claims Cape Girardeau Resident." UFO Chronicles, 2015 (reproducing 1973 wire coverage). theufochronicles.com
• "50th Anniversary of the SE Missouri Ozarks UFO Flap: Piedmont, Clearwater Lake, Farmington, Wayne County." Ziegelmeyer, Debbie & Kay, Margie. Amazon listing. amazon.com
• "Piedmont, Missouri," Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org
• "Wayne County, Missouri," Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org
• "Piedmont Area Chamber of Commerce | History." visitpiedmontmo.com
• "Category:Piedmont, Missouri," Wikimedia Commons. commons.wikimedia.org
• "File:Piedmont Missouri.jpg," Wikimedia Commons (public domain photograph used as this case file's hero image). commons.wikimedia.org
• "File:Project Blue Book report - 1957-10-7228365-Piedmont-Missouri.pdf," Wikimedia Commons. commons.wikimedia.org
• "Investigation of UFO reports by the United States government," Wikipedia (Project Blue Book closure date). en.wikipedia.org
• Rutledge, Harley D. Project Identification (Prentice-Hall, 1981), cited sections: dedication (Bone); ch. 1 pp. 1–9 (flap, March 27 memo, Hynek visit, Bone account, 1967 flap, April 6 visit); ch. 2 pp. 10–19 (Ueleke headlamp calculation, April 12 Cessna 150 flight and 7,200 mph / 330 g arithmetic); ch. 3 (team, objectives, lay-report rule, Table I for April 13); ch. 4 (coincidences); ch. 5 (May 11 flight); ch. 7 (Operation Intercept, radar order); ch. 11 (June 4 jets); ch. 12 (June 19 bullet-shaped object; July 10 jet); ch. 14 (truck-driver incident, flare test, compensation case, Vallée quotation); ch. 17 (1975–1980 sightings); ch. 18 (statistics: 158 stations, 427 hours, 620/378 observer definition, 157/178/34, 40 Class B set aside, day-of-week table, FAA radar coverage). Read via the Internet Archive scan and page images. archive.org
• "Piedmont and Wayne County: State UFO Capitals of Missouri." Missouri Secretary of State ("several hundred calls," February–April 1973). sos.mo.gov
• UPI, "UFO attack" report on Eddie Doyle Webb, Columbus Dispatch, October 5, 1973 (transcribed by Patrick Gross). ufologie.patrickgross.org
• "1973 UFO sightings abound throughout Southeast Missouri." Southeast Missourian (retrospective; Webb, Dr. C. E. Windsor). web.archive.org
• Graney, Christopher. "MO UFOs... and Miracles." Vatican Observatory, Sacred Space Astronomy, October 11, 2025 (park signage text; assessment of the book).
• Knuth, Kevin H., et al. "The New Science of Unidentified Aerospace-Undersea Phenomena (UAP)." arXiv:2502.06794, 2025, Appendix A.14. arxiv.org
• NASA JPL Horizons, observer ephemeris for the Moon from 37.150°N, 90.696°W, February 22, 1973, 02:00–08:00 UT (about 77% illuminated; rising about 04:40 UT). ssd.jpl.nasa.gov
• Open-Meteo Historical Weather API (ERA5), hourly cloud cover, precipitation and temperature for 37.15°N, 90.70°W, February 21–22, 1973. open-meteo.com

Corrections (October 2026)

A fact-check against Rutledge's own book (read in full text and, where the OCR was garbled, from the page images), period wire coverage and the Southeast Missourian found that the earlier version of this page reversed or misdated several of its key points. J. Allen Hynek did not dismiss Coach Bone's account: he said "neither of us can punch any holes in the story of the basketball coach." Jacques Vallée never called Rutledge "a confused local scientist"; that is a blogger's paraphrase, and Vallée's actual complaint was that local scientists had examined the Webb case "out of context," that is, that Rutledge had been too quick to call it a possible hoax. The 7,200 mph / 330 g figure came from the April 12, 1973 flight and is Rutledge's arithmetic on a student's naked-eye estimate, not a May 11 team measurement; the ten lights were seen on May 11, not April 11, and by Rutledge alone. The figures of "620 participants, 378 vetted official members" are observer-nights, not people; Rutledge thanks "nearly 40 Project members." Rutledge "selected" 40 Class B sightings as possible unidentified aircraft; the team did not "attribute 40 of 42" to aircraft. The 157/178/34 totals cover the whole 1973–1980 study, not its first year.

Following this review, the rating was changed from Disputed 47 to Disputed 40 (October 27, 2026), because the higher rating had rested partly on claims corrected or removed above.

The Webb incident was rewritten from Rutledge's first-hand account: it happened on I-55 near Jackson, not near Greenville; the Highway Patrol, not local police, passed the glasses to Rutledge; Rutledge himself made the flare test and called a hoax possible; and the examining ophthalmologist found no eye injury. The "psychic shock" remark is now attributed to Dr. C. E. Windsor of St. Louis. Bone learned of his ALS about six months before the sighting, not after. Rutledge chaired his department from 1964, not from 1966. The Project did order a radar set (it never arrived). Removed as unsupported: Bone's "after a loss" and a composite Bone quotation; Rutledge's reading list of Jessup, Menzel, Klass and Hall, and the "contactee-adjacent" description of Keyhoe; the 1967 flap as part of his motivation (he says it drew "only a mild interest"); a dean removing Project references; the newspaper's "exclusive access" arrangement; the "strobes," "call-and-response" and "flashlight effect" taxonomy (Rutledge's term is the "random flashbulb effect"); lights "ten feet apart" and jets with non-standard lighting on June 4–5; Ruth Rutledge's "dread" and "every member of the household" in 1979; the 1986 talk as his "only" presentation; Time-Life and Gregory Little references; a mural honoring Rutledge and the muralist Katie Coleman; Br. Guy Consolmagno's media policy; and the claim that Hessdalen researchers cited Rutledge as their precedent. Also corrected: July 9 to July 10 (serrated-wing jet), the Clearwater Dam completion date (1948), the lunar illumination (3% to about 77%, NASA JPL Horizons) and the weather (rain to clear and dry, ERA5) for February 21, 1973.